G7 countries privately acknowledge their rejection of idea of seizing Russian assets
 
            
                At the recent gathering of G20 finance ministers in Brazil, delegates were gripped by a deep sense of unease over a pressing issue: the potential seizure or use of Russian assets frozen under the Western sanctions that followed its invasion of Ukraine,  reported from the Financial Times.
Two ministers — Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed al-Jadaan and Indonesia’s Sri Mulyani Indrawati — were among those particularly alarmed by the idea. Were G7 countries seriously preparing to do this?
And had they considered the full implications of such a drastic step? Their questions to their Western counterparts cut to the heart of a fraught debate over whether hundreds of billions of euros in frozen Russian central bank assets should be mobilized to help fund Ukraine as the conflict there drags into a third year.
Doing so would deliver a financial boost with the potential to turn the war in Kyiv’s favor, argue those in support, led by the US.
For opponents of the idea, such a move risks setting a dangerous precedent in international law — one that could endanger not only the interests of any country that falls out with Western capitals but also the international legal order itself.
www.anews.az
            
            
            
        Two ministers — Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed al-Jadaan and Indonesia’s Sri Mulyani Indrawati — were among those particularly alarmed by the idea. Were G7 countries seriously preparing to do this?
And had they considered the full implications of such a drastic step? Their questions to their Western counterparts cut to the heart of a fraught debate over whether hundreds of billions of euros in frozen Russian central bank assets should be mobilized to help fund Ukraine as the conflict there drags into a third year.
Doing so would deliver a financial boost with the potential to turn the war in Kyiv’s favor, argue those in support, led by the US.
For opponents of the idea, such a move risks setting a dangerous precedent in international law — one that could endanger not only the interests of any country that falls out with Western capitals but also the international legal order itself.
www.anews.az
 
                             
                             
                             
                             
                     
                         
                             
                             
                             
                             
                             
                             
                             
                             
                             
         
         
                        
                     
                        
                     
                        
                     
                        
                     
                        
                     
                        
                     
                        
                    